Standard News

Hide Advertisement
  • Business
  • Culture
  • News
  • Technology
  • Trending
Site logo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
News

Supreme Court agrees to hear immigrant detention dispute

By Reuters 2 min read
  • # Updated
Demonstrators from the immigrant community advocacy group CASA carry signs as they march in the hopes of a ruling in their favor on decisions at the Supreme Court building in Washington

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether immigrants detained for more than six months by the U.S. government while deportation proceedings take place are eligible for a hearing in which they can argue for their release.

Advertisement

The decision by the justices to hear a case focusing on the rights of people flagged for deportation comes during a presidential election campaign in which immigration has been a hot topic.

The court agreed to hear an Obama administration appeal of an October 2015 ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld a lower-court injunction requiring a hearing after six months of detention.

The long-running class action litigation brought by the American Civil Liberties Union includes some immigrants who were held at the border when seeking illegal entry into the United States and others, including legal permanent residents, who have been convicted of crimes.

If the immigrants were granted a bond hearing, the government would have to show they are flight risks or a danger to the community in order for the detention to continue.

The Justice Department said in court papers that the appeals court decision was “fundamentally wrong” because it dramatically expanded the number of people eligible for hearings and set a high bar for the government to argue that a detainee should not be released.

The ACLU responded in its court papers that the government had exaggerated the impact of the court injunction, which has been in place since 2012 and applies only to immigrants in the Los Angeles area.

Since it has been in effect, there has been “no evidence of adverse effects on immigration enforcement,” the ACLU lawyers said.

The court will hear oral arguments and decide the case during its next term, which starts in October and ends in June 2017.

In one of the biggest cases of its current term, the Supreme Court is due to decide by the end of the month whether to reinstate President Barack Obama’s 2014 executive action to shield millions of immigrants in the country illegally from deportation. The plan was blocked by lower courts.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

tagreuters.com2016binary_LYNXNPEC5J12E-VIEWIMAGE

Advertisement - Continue reading below

Muhammad Ali: ‘Greatest’ boxer, showman, ambassador
News
Reuters 6 min read

Muhammad Ali: ‘Greatest’ boxer, showman, ambassador

Exclusive: FBI raids home of ex-College Board official in probe of SAT leak
News
Reuters 6 min read

Exclusive: FBI raids home of ex-College Board official in probe of SAT leak

California Assembly passes gun control bills
News
Reuters 2 min read

California Assembly passes gun control bills

Prosecutor removes herself from Chicago cop’s murder trial
News
Reuters 2 min read

Prosecutor removes herself from Chicago cop’s murder trial

Congress scrutinizes pay TV billing, competitive practices
News
Reuters 2 min read

Congress scrutinizes pay TV billing, competitive practices

U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, auditor finds
News
Reuters 4 min read

U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, auditor finds

Dallas police job applications surge after fatal ambush attacks
News
Reuters 2 min read

Dallas police job applications surge after fatal ambush attacks

Mylan CEO to testify before House panel over EpiPen pricing
News
Reuters 2 min read

Mylan CEO to testify before House panel over EpiPen pricing

Chicago airport staffing to increase after long security lines
News
Reuters 2 min read

Chicago airport staffing to increase after long security lines

Supreme Court rejects constitutional challenge to death penalty
News
Reuters 2 min read

Supreme Court rejects constitutional challenge to death penalty

load more Loading posts...

sidebar

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

sidebar-alt

  • About Us
  • Imprint
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy